Advertisements

A Green New Deal For Global Security

As we enter the New Year of 2019, we face the potential for more record global warmth. The fossil fuel burning that has continued for so long, that has been industrialized and unwisely linked (by industry and policy) to economic growth in many regions continues at a devastating pace. A pace that injects about 37 billion tons of heat-trapping carbon dioxide into our atmosphere each year. For in too many cases, the necessary transition to an admittedly much stronger and far more viable clean energy economy has been blocked or delayed.

A Harmful Status Quo

We are a world locked in conflict between old fossil fuel interests and emerging clean energy and pro climate change response interests. Thus far, the conflict has generated a state of both economic and political grid-lock. One that at present perpetuates the harmful status quo.

We face vast continued greenhouse gas emissions presenting a growing danger to everyone and everything living on Earth. The threat of damaging climate change occurring on human time-scales is no longer some far-off object whose emerging reality can easily be hidden from public view by republican deniers in the U.S. government and abroad or related mass media campaigns funded by the fossil fuel monetary and political interests who authored the crisis.

surface melt ponding Amery ice shelf

(Increasing surface melt ponding in both Antarctica and Greenland, as seen in this January 1, 2019 satellite shot of the Amery Ice Shelf, is one visible sign of climate change’s growing impacts. Large land ice sheet melt is the primary driver of both sea level rise and changes to ocean circulation. Just two of many harms driven by fossil fuel burning and related carbon emissions. Image provided by NASA Worldview.)

The threat posed by human-caused climate change is one that impacts us now. And though present impacts are mild compared to a future in which vast fossil fuel burning and related dumping of carbon into Earth’s atmosphere continues, we are faced with growing damage, hurt, and harm today.

How did we get here? It’s a big question. One to be answered fully by future historians. But we can simply say that we haven’t transitioned away from fossil fuel burning fast enough. That we haven’t yet adopted clean energy or clean political thinking at a swift enough pace. That the old ways of power-brokering linked to fossil fuel burning continue with a tenacity which is, itself, difficult to deny.

Old Smoke-Stack Politics vs New Clean Energy Politics

Though a single blog is perhaps too short an article to address such a vast issue fully, it is certainly possible to take a look at the tip of the (metaphorically and literally) melting ice-berg. In doing so, we ask the teasing question — how are such seemingly far-flung objects as Amery Ice Shelf melt ponds, a Green New Deal, Russian meddling in the 2016 election, and Russian nuclear capable bombers in Venezuela linked?

As literary objects go the question is, of course, rhetorical. But it is one that reveals how old smokestack style power-plays can keep us stuck in the ongoing harmful pattern of fossil fuel burning, warming, and increasing global environmental damage together with the related geopolitical conflict that all too frequently results. It also opens up the avenue to a new geopolitical contest to old regimes. One based on clean energy economies of scale and technological innovation coupled with climate change response.

Clean Energy Enabled Obama’s Counter to Russian Aggression

Back during the Obama Administration, there was a larger challenge to old forms of power brokering. It happened when Russia invaded the Ukraine and the U.S. sanctioned Russian oil ventures such as the fossil fuel multinational — Rosneft.

The U.S., under Obama, through both clean energy policy and increased oil extraction at home had become more energy independent. But more importantly, with policies such as EV incentives, increased fuel efficiency standards for automobiles, the sun shot initiative, adherence to the Paris Climate Agreement, and the implementation of the Clean Power Plan taking hold, the U.S. was also turning toward a future that was finally less dependent on fossil fuels and, more importantly, the broad availability of oil and gas. The U.S., under Obama, was thus able to move more and more away from the old oil and gas politics that might have forced our nation to turn a blind eye to Russian aggression in Eastern Europe. Instead, old oil-based global policy gave way to something new as the U.S. effectively canceled an Exxon-Mobil contract with Rosneft even as it moved to hamper Russia’s oil oligarchs in retaliation for its physical aggression.

Russia — Slave to Oil and Gas Revenue

Then and now, Rosneft was a cornerstone of Russian political and economic power. The company, like the East India Trade Company of the old British Empire, serves Russia as a way of projecting its power abroad. We see this in Russia’s past use of gas shipments to influence Europe. We see it in Russia’s past and present use of oil ventures like Rosneft to gain political footholds in places like Venezuela. And we see it in Russia’s attempts to use Rosneft to directly influence U.S. policy through relationships with western oil giants like Exxon.

Western sanctions against Rosneft and related oil oligarchs put a check on Russian power projection. It also leveled a direct threat to Russia’s narrow economic power base. Represented, in part, by its use of Rosneft as a political tool for power projection, Russia is itself fully invested in fossil fuel burning. For not only is Rosneft a lever for Russian power brokering abroad, the company exists in a context in which 16 percent of Russian GDP comes from oil and gas money. Moreover, 52 percent of Russia’s federal budget is funded by fossil fuel revenues from state-corporate entities such as Rosneft. Meanwhile, 70 percent of Russia’s export revenue comes from the oil and gas sector. Unable or, more likely, unwilling to diversify its economy away from oil and gas, Russia is instead a slave to it.

2016 Election Meddling in Context

Given the above, we can see that the Russian economy suffers a kind of resource curse in relation to its dependence on fossil fuels. But Russia has also taken a rather odd stance with regards to climate change. National policy has long considered climate change beneficial to Russia. This despite the fact that recent research shows numerous harms including movement of rains away from most productive soils, expanding wildfires in the north, widespread loss of land due to sea level rise, and destabilization of border states to the south.

(How a Green New Deal would make America great by enabling us to confront foreign adversaries and climate harms in one go.)

That said, after grappling with an Obama Administration more emboldened to sanction its fossil fuel industry, Russia had every short term economic and political incentive to seek regime change in the U.S. Trump, with his climate change denial, promise to double down on old energy sources like oil gas and coal, and his stated aims to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement while cancelling programs like the Clean Power Plan appeared to be ready to generate policy more beneficial to Russia’s fossil fuel sector. With oil and gas presently so central to Russia’s economy, the motivation to support Trump on an economic and political power basis alone must have been quite strong. This on top of a widely cited motivation to generate chaos and division in the U.S. during election season.

Venezuela: Oil as Power Lever and Motivator for Aggression

Following its meddling in the 2016 U.S. election with the stated aim to place Donald Trump as President, Russia’s oil-based power plays continued. This time, Rosneft gained a lien on 50 percent of Citgo — the Venezuelan state oil company. Venezuela, even more heavily dependent on oil revenue than Russia, has been facing economic decline ever since oil prices crashed during the late 2000s. Smelling opportunity, Russia has moved into Venezuela, funded its debt, and announced joint oil production agreements.

Russia’s increased hold over Venezuela is also reminiscent of past cold war power moves in which easily leveraged resources like oil often played a key role in establishing vassal or proxy states. The most recent move by Russia brings with it the old sabre rattling of nuclear capable weapons system movements and related media sensationalism as Russia’s deployment of two nuclear bombers to a Venezuelan air base ruffled feathers from Europe to the U.S.

Green New Deal — A Way Forward for U.S. Climate and National Security

Russia’s power plays may seem similar to the past. But they occur in a context where the U.S. increasingly has the option to respond by doubling down on clean energy policy as a means to directly counter the might of bad actor regimes dependent on fossil fuel revenue. This is in direct contrast to the cold war where hard power responses like troop movements and weapons systems deployments were seen as central to national defense.

In the new era, such movements of troops may also be seen as necessary. But the response that matters most to long term U.S. national security is the lessening of reliance on fossil fuel to give the U.S. a better bargaining position vis a vis petro states like Russia while simultaneously reducing the nation’s contribution to the climate crisis.

Such synergistic foreign policy benefits evoking a new U.S. economic and moral leadership would seem to make clean energy based programs like the Green New Deal and revitalization of energy efficiency and clean energy supports a no-brainer nationally. These are domestic programs with global consequences for the future of the United States. And the fact that adversaries like Russia are working hard to prevent the implementation of such programs at home should provide a clear incentive for all Americans to support them.

Advertisements
Leave a comment

80 Comments

  1. Marcel Guldemond

     /  January 2, 2019

    Hi Robert, thanks for the post. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about geoengineering, that the ideal solution to buy humanity some time would be a short lived sunlight blocker that could be applied just over the Arctic in the spring and summer, keeping the ice and the permafrost from melting completely.

    A big impediment to this would be Russia. I’m guessing that any country who tries this would get into serious trouble with Russia because of all the oil and gas and shipping infrastructure they’re building that counts on disappeared ice, so anyone who refreezes the Arctic would surely piss them off.

    Like

    Reply
  2. eleggua

     /  January 3, 2019

    Rosneft = the “mystery company” in this case:
    “12.23.2018: The Supreme Court is putting on hold a contempt order against an unnamed company fighting a subpoena in a mystery case with possible ties to special counsel Robert Mueller.

    A lower court last week upheld the subpoena after the company, which is owned by a foreign government, argued that it was immune from criminal proceedings under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and that the subpoena was unenforceable because it would require “the Corporation” to violate “Country A’s” domestic law.

    Chief Justice John Roberts on Sunday halted the contempt order against the company, which included a $5,000-a-week fine.

    The stay is temporary until the court has further orders. The federal government, which sought the subpoena, has until Dec. 31 to respond.”

    ‘The Fall Of Trump Tower Moscow And Rise Of The Rosneft Deal’
    12.11.2018
    https://hillreporter.com/fall-trump-power-rise-rosneft-deal-17323

    “The failed attempt at a deal to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow, as well as Michael Cohen’s initial lies to Congress and his subsequent special counsel confession about that deal, have fueled a firestorm of examination in recent months. In the midst of that firestorm, much attention was deflected away from perhaps an even more significant development, one that focuses on Russia, Qatar, numerous shell companies, and the Trump Organization. The deal specifically centered around commissions on the sale of a 19% stake in oil giant Rosneft a publicly traded company that is owned mostly by the Russian government, specifically, Putin and his closest allies and oligarchs….

    In December of 2016, Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin and Russian President Vladimir Putin announced on state TV that a 19.5% stake in Rosneft was sold to Qatar Investment Authority and Glencore PLC (remember that according to the dossier Trump was promised the brokerage fees on the sale of up to 19% of Rosneft). The deal also involved many anonymous shell companies which are almost impossible to track, including QHG Shares, QHC Holding, and QHC Cayman Limited….”

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. eleggua

     /  January 3, 2019

    US sanctions in action: China and Rosneft:

    ‘China strikes oil and gas deals with Russia’s Rosneft’
    11.30.2018
    https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-Trends/China-strikes-oil-and-gas-deals-with-Russia-s-Rosneft

    “Russian state-owned company Rosneft announced Thursday that it has signed energy deals with a pair of Chinese energy counterparts, seizing an opportunity as Beijing moves to diversify suppliers amid the trade war with the U.S.

    China National Chemical, known as ChemChina, agreed to purchase 2.4 million tons a year of crude oil from Rosneft. That amount is equivalent to 6% of Rosneft’s total exports to China in 2017. Crude oil from Eastern Siberia will be transported to a Russian Far East port by pipeline.

    Rosneft will also form a joint venture with Beijing Gas Group to operate filling stations in Russia for natural gas-fueled vehicles. Beijing Gas, a unit of state-owned Beijing Enterprises Group, will take a stake of nearly half in the venture and provide expertise on setting up and running gas stations.

    Russia, struggling with international sanctions imposed after its annexation of Crimea, is eager to find customers for its natural resources. The trade war between the world’s two largest economies, which is set to reduce China’s energy procurement from the U.S., presents an opening for Moscow….

    …The latest agreement follows a 2017 agreement between Beijing Gas and Rosneft for the Chinese company to acquire partial rights to Siberian oil and gas fields from the Russian partner for $1.1 billion. Now Beijing Gas will help Rosneft in its effort to run a station business, apparently hoping to secure increased supplies of Russian gas down the road.

    China relies heavily on energy imports, buying about 70% of the oil and around 40% of the natural gas it consumes from other countries. In the first half of this year, 7% of China’s liquefied natural gas imports came from the U.S.

    About half of the deals China signed with the U.S. during President Donald Trump’s visit last year were for gas and other resource development projects. But now that Beijing has imposed additional tariffs on American energy products, supplies from the U.S. are expected to decline.

    China is set to increase its purchase of LNG from Qatar and plans to meet its oil demand by increasing crude imports from Russia.”

    Like

    Reply
  4. Jean Swan

     /  January 3, 2019

    Trump is putting in a new science adviser who is a capable scientist and an extremely kind,good person..A lot of Oklahoma University grads hope no one tells Trump that he made a good choice:https://newsok.com/article/5619234/ou-meteorologist-kelvin-droegemeier-approved-to-be-trumps-science-adviser?no_edit=1&fbclid=IwAR3tQ2vD-hFGpzwbh73AhoTgZiuovEhcsmHqXfRNKnHko2yA5y5qjMwWdck

    Like

    Reply
  5. wharf rat

     /  January 3, 2019

    Climate Change in Europe in 2018: the evidence
    last updated: 03/01/2019

    2018 most ‘extreme year’ for unusual weather events in Europe

    Record heat and precipitation recorded across the continent

    We’re the ‘last generation to act against climate change,’ global organisation warns

    Scientists urge global temperature should not rise 1.5C above pre-industrial levels

    Europe was one continent that experienced abnormal weather during 2018. After a couple months of extremely cold weather, heat and drought through spring and summer meant temperatures were well above average in much of the northern and western areas.

    https://www.euronews.com/2019/01/02/special-report-was-2018-the-worst-year-for-climate-change-so-far

    Like

    Reply
  6. wharf rat

     /  January 4, 2019

    Climate Change Performance Index 2018

    These are the Overall Results of the Climate Change Performance Index 2018. The ranking results are defined by a country’s aggregated performance regarding 14 indicators within the four categories GHG Emissions, Renewable Energy, Energy Use and Climate Policy.The CCPI 2018 Results illustrate the main regional differences in climate protection and performance within the 56 evaluated countries and the EU. Despite decreasing growth rates in GHG emissions, still no country performed well enough to reach the rating “very high” in the 2018 index and therefore the top three ranks remain left open.In the 2018 edition of the index, Sweden is leading the list, followed by Lithuania and Morocco, while Saudi Arabia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Republic of Korea, Australia and the United States form the bottom five of this classification, scoring “low” or “very low” across almost all categories.

    https://www.climate-change-performance-index.org/climate-change-performance-index-2018

    Like

    Reply
  7. mlp in nc

     /  January 5, 2019

    FYI: Earth Nullschool North Atlantic SSTA 10.6C (west of Cape Cod and south of Newfoundland).

    Like

    Reply
  8. Leland Palmer

     /  January 9, 2019

    Hi Robert-

    I keep wondering about these hot spots in the ocean near Svalbard island. They have been stable since about 2015, now. They persist in summer and winter in the Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly record. They are now showing up as consistently more than 10 degrees C (18 degrees F !) hotter than they have been historically.

    https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/ocean/primary/waves/overlay=sea_surface_temp/orthographic=0.98,80.25,3000/loc=6.994,77.699

    Are they merely areas that were under the retreating Arctic sea ice, and that now look relatively hotter due to that? They are also showing up as hotter than surrounding areas in the Sea Surface Temperature record. All this is according to Earth Nullschool, which uses data supplied by NASA.

    These anomalies are showing as hotter than areas to the south of them, now, in the sea surface temperature record. So they are showing up now in the sea surface temperature record, not just the sea surface temperature anomaly record, to repeat myself.

    I don’t like the look of these things, and I don’t like it that nobody seems to be talking about these temperature anomalies. The Norwegian government, which controls Svalbard, is heavily involved in fossil fuel exploitation, while relatively forward thinking in energy policy in general.

    Of course the Gulf Stream off the coast of the Eastern U.S. is blazing like a beacon in the Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly record, with temperatures up to 8 degrees C hotter than the historical average of a few decades ago.

    Like

    Reply
  9. mlp in nc

     /  January 10, 2019

    Sorry I don’t have any insight, but if I come up with anything useful I will try to post. Some comment, though.

    I have been following several SSTAs on Earth Nullschool and share your unease. Though my following is not terribly regularly, still several areas have gone up by 2-3C within a year or so, which seems uncomfortably fast to me. I tried to find current and running graphs of total ocean heat content but had no luck. NOAA, conveniently, is down. Closest is this article https://www.carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-climate-new-record-ocean-heat-content-and-growing-a-el-nino, with a graph of total ocean heat content that, at 0-700 m. that is shooting upward since 1990 at a nearly 45 degree angle. It is hard to know what that means in general, but I remember a 2013 article – – https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/21/yachtsman-describes-horror-at-dead-rubbish-strewn-pacific-ocean – – by an Australian who described a “dead Pacific”. Maybe overfishing is not the only cause. What can a fish do with SSTA sreaching 9 – 17C or an overall environment nearly four times hotter than 30 years before? The sailor, who became a climate activist, had this to say: “Ivan MacFadyen told of his horror at the severe lack of marine life and copious amounts of rubbish witnessed on a yacht race between Melbourne and Osaka. He recently returned from the trip, which he previously completed 10 years ago.
    “In 2003, I caught a fish every day,” he told Guardian Australia. “Ten years later to the day, sailing almost exactly the same course, I caught nothing. It started to strike me the closer we got to Japan that the ocean was dead.”
    “Normally when you are sailing a yacht, there are one or two pods of dolphins playing by the boat, or sharks, or turtles or whales. There are usually birds feeding by the boat. But there was none of that. I’ve been sailing for 35 years and it’s only when these things aren’t there that you notice them.”

    I am also no closer to understanding the Svalbard hot spots. Thought maybe the Gulf Stream
    finger currents were backing up against the southward cold currents at those spots, but why should it be so globular, especially the smaller one to the east? Very irritating not to be able to figure it out.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  10. mlp in nc

     /  January 10, 2019

    PS. My own experience sort of confirms. Decades ago, the NC Outer Bank beaches were always littered lots of ocean debris – many beautiful and varied shells, seaweed, coral, skate egg cases, fish vertebrae, sharks teeth (I even have a Megalodon tooth), etc. Last year on a short trip there was almost nothing. A few, mostly small, scattered and battered shells and unrecognizable debris, mainly clams, scallops, jingle shells, and a rare whelk core. A fellow beach walker, obviously not a native, was going bananas over this pathetic offering and I nearly cried.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • eleggua

       /  January 10, 2019

      Echoes the ‘insect apocalypse’.

      “Sune Boye Riis was on a bike ride with his youngest son, enjoying the sun slanting over the fields and woodlands near their home north of Copenhagen, when it suddenly occurred to him that something about the experience was amiss. Specifically, something was missing.

      It was summer. He was out in the country, moving fast. But strangely, he wasn’t eating any bugs.

      For a moment, Riis was transported to his childhood on the Danish island of Lolland, in the Baltic Sea. Back then, summer bike rides meant closing his mouth to cruise through thick clouds of insects, but inevitably he swallowed some anyway. When his parents took him driving, he remembered, the car’s windshield was frequently so smeared with insect carcasses that you almost couldn’t see through it. But all that seemed distant now. He couldn’t recall the last time he needed to wash bugs from his windshield; he even wondered, vaguely, whether car manufacturers had invented some fancy new coating to keep off insects. But this absence, he now realized with some alarm, seemed to be all around him. Where had all those insects gone? And when? And why hadn’t he noticed?…”

      Like

      Reply
  11. wharf rat

     /  January 11, 2019

    Warming oceans likely to raise sea levels 30cm by end of century – study
    Seawater temperature is rising faster than predicted, which is likely to worsen extreme weather events around the world

    The report, published on Thursday in the journal Science, found that the warming of the oceans was accelerating and was matching the predictions of climate change models, which have shown global temperature rises are likely to lead to extreme weather across the world.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jan/10/warming-oceans-likely-to-raise-sea-levels-30cm-by-end-of-century-study

    Like

    Reply
  12. Leland Palmer

     /  January 11, 2019

    Hi mlp in nc –

    We knew that ocean heat content was increasing, and that most of the heat from global warming is going into the oceans. The New York Times, that has often been silent or engaged in false impartiality when dealing with global warming issues, now belatedly acknowledges that:

    “Scientists say the world’s oceans are warming far more quickly than previously thought, a finding with dire implications for climate change because almost all the excess heat absorbed by the planet ends up stored in their waters.

    A new analysis, published Thursday in the journal Science, found that the oceans are heating up 40 percent faster on average than a United Nations panel estimated five years ago. The researchers also concluded that ocean temperatures have broken records for several straight years.

    “2018 is going to be the warmest year on record for the Earth’s oceans,” said Zeke Hausfather, an energy systems analyst at the independent climate research group Berkeley Earth and an author of the study. “As 2017 was the warmest year, and 2016 was the warmest year.””

    So, all of us that read this blog knew that. Ocean heat content is going up.

    What worries me more than anything about these Svalbard anomalies is how constant they are, how they persist summer and winter, and now they are showing up in the sea surface temperature record as hotter than areas to the south of them. Certainly, no Arctic sea ice will form on these twin anomalies, so long as they exist.

    The anomalies are remarkably constant, almost as if they were tied to the ocean bottom, I think. To me, that suggests that methane hydrate dissociation may be involved, in some way. This has happened before, in the Barents sea – there are milllions of pockmarks on the floor of the Barents Sea, a well known sign of gas hydrate dissociation left over the geologists tell us from the Holocene Climate Optimum of a few thousand years ago.. This area was under pressure of ice sheets thousands of years ago, and may have formed large deposits of relic metastable methane hydrate, persisting for thousands of years in areas of pressure and temperature outside of the current hydrate stability zone.

    So, I think that warmer water temperatures may be touching off methane hydrate dissociation in the ocean floor, in these anomalies.

    I would be happy to be wrong about this.

    Like

    Reply
    • Leland Palmer

       /  January 11, 2019

      The Barents sea is shallow with an average depth of only 230 meters. Svalbard was also glaciated a few thousand years ago, and has been reported to be a site of relic metastable methane hydrate. Warm water from abnormally warm ocean currents is now intruding into the area. The Svalbard area may be the site of the most extensive, shallowest deposits of relic metastable methane hydrate in the world, don’t know. it all makes an ugly pattern, I think, unfortunately.

      There are other possible explanations, I think. I remember reading something about melting Arctic sea ice producing a fresher water layer on the sea surface, leading to a warming effect somehow.

      So, i’m hoping these anomalies will go away, or that there is another possible explanation other than methane hydrate dissociation. If it is methane hydrate dissociation, I’m hoping that the immediate effect is mostly contained in the oceans, and mostly confined to shallow deposits of relic metastable methane hydrate, outside the current methane hydrate stability zone, left over from past ice ages when the pressure of ice sheets led to the formation of shallow methane hydrate.

      This paper disagrees, and says that the release of methane off Spitsbergen has been an ongoing process due to glacial rebound, going on for thousands of years.

      https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180108121547.htm

      But these Svalbard/Spitsbergen ocean temperature anomalies are huge, and the temperatures impressively anomalous. If the hot spots are tied to methane release, I’m not sure that glacial rebound is a sufficient explanation. It would be nice if an international team of scientists paid some attention to them and gave us a truly comprehensive explanation.

      Like

      Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 11, 2019

        Others have noticed.

        http://www.oilseedcrops.org/2018/09/26/anomalous-warm-waters-in-the-arctic-did-underwater-volcanoes-awake/

        ‘Anomalous Warm Waters in the Arctic Did Underwater Volcanoes Awake?’
        September 26, 2018

        “Strange warm Arctic Ocean tempertaures in a circular point @ 77.5N and 5.5E, in my opinion it could be a large underwater eruption causing the anomalous hot spot near Svalbard? ”

        ^^^Intro to a much longer piece.

        Like

        Reply
        • eleggua

           /  January 12, 2019

          ^That’s a reprint of the original, found here.
          View story at Medium.com

          “I did Circle here in yellow what I thought could be a mount under sea, because this seems to be in the holes Svalbard Fracture Zone. so how many of these underwater volcanoes are going off right now that are not being measured by Volcano Discovery or the USGS or anybody in that realm, because we’re just not seeing the ash and smoke. It’s just my opinion, but perhaps there is an underwater eruption massive enough to change water temperatures this much around this location.”

          Like

      • eleggua

         /  January 12, 2019

        And here’s a possible cause.

        ‘Hot times near Svalbard – Volcanic range discovered’
        Anthony Watts / August 2, 2013
        https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/02/hot-times-near-svalbard-volcanic-range-discovered/

        “Researchers have found a 1,500 km volcanic mountain chain hidden off the coast of Svalbard, which could soon break the surface to form a new island chain.

        Dag Rune Olsen, rector of the University of Bergen, where the researchers are based, told The Local that the findings were like a “moon landing in the deep sea.”

        “We probably know even less about the very deep seas and oceans then we know about the moon,” he said. The range extends from Jan Mayen island in the Greenland Sea to the Fram Strait between Svalbard and Greenland. It comprises hundreds of volcanos, some just 20m below the surface.

        The new discovery comprises hundreds more volcanoes, some just 20m below the surface.

        The ridge was first glimpsed in 2008, but this is the first time detailed mapping has been done.

        “We have found volcanoes at such a shallow level and they could break the surface at any time and form a new island group,” Pedersen told VG newspaper.

        “We have long known that Iceland has both volcanic activity and hot springs, but we thought that we did not have anything like that in Norway. But we do, it was only under water,” he added.”

        Like

        Reply
        • eleggua

           /  January 12, 2019

          Caveat to all of the above: the authors favour a mini-ice age theory over the reality of global warming.

          Like

        • Robert in New Orleans

           /  January 15, 2019

          Sorry, but I would not trust anything on low wattage up with that website.

          Like

        • eleggua

           /  January 15, 2019

          Indeed; that’s why I’d added the caveat.

          Upon further review, the research is real. These sources are trustworthy.

          http://sciencenordic.com/waterworld-volcanoes

          A waterworld of volcanoes
          August 8, 2013 – 05:00
          Article from University of Bergen

          “…. New discoveries

          This summer a team led by the director of UiB’s Centre for Geobiology, Professor Rolf Birger Pedersen, discovered five new hydrothermal vents in Loki’s Castle. The vents were discovered at depths ranging from 100 to 2,500 metres.

          In this area, which is the most geological active part of Norway, a new volcanic seabed is formed at a rate of two centimetres a year.

          “These discoveries are incredibly interesting as they represent a part of the Norwegian nature that is under-explored. They represent a part of nature where conditions are extreme and where we expect to find a lot of new and exciting biology,” sUiB’s Rector Dag Rune Olsen…..”

          Like

        • eleggua

           /  January 15, 2019

          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130802080240.htm

          A waterworld of volcanoes

          Date:
          August 2, 2013
          Source:
          University of Bergen
          Summary:
          At Loki’s Castle in the Arctic Ocean, researchers have discovered a so far unknown world of volcanic activity underwater. They hope that this can become Norway’s new national park.

          “…Norway is a volcanic country on par with Iceland. The difference being that whereas Iceland’s volcanoes are onshore, Norway’s volcano landscape is in the deep sea. Norway’s volcanoes are lined up underwater in large active earthquake zones, and there are hydrothermal vents churning out hot water — at 320 degrees Celsius — which gives rise to unique ecosystems and metal deposits on the seabed….”

          Like

    • eleggua

       /  January 17, 2019

      Maybe you’ve both seen this info already.

      ‘Are methane seeps in the Arctic slowing global warming?’
      May. 8, 2017
      https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/are-methane-seeps-arctic-slowing-global-warming

      “…Research off the coast of Norway’s Svalbard archipelago suggests that where methane gas bubbles up from seafloor seeps, surface waters directly above absorb twice as much carbon dioxide (CO2) as surrounding waters. The findings suggest that methane seeps in isolated spots in the Arctic could lessen the impact of climate change.

      “This is … totally unexpected,” says Brett Thornton, a geochemist at Stockholm University who was not involved in the research. These new findings challenge the popular assumption that methane seeps inevitably increase the global greenhouse gas burden….

      …To find out just how much methane the Arctic Ocean was contributing to the global balance, biogeochemist John Pohlman of the U.S. Geological Survey in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, set out to measure the gas close to the ocean surface above known methane seeps near Svalbard during the Arctic summer. He and his team were constantly surprised by how little methane they found. But the bigger surprise was that surface water CO2 levels dropped whenever their ship crossed a seep. “[The CO2 data] became the most important part of the story,” Pohlman says.

      When combined with other data—sudden drops in water temperature, along with increases in dissolved oxygen and pH at the surface—the lower CO2 levels were telltale signs of bottom water upwelling and photosynthesis, Pohlman says. Pohlman and his team conclude that the same physical forces that are pushing the methane bubbles up are also pumping nutrient-rich cold waters from the sea bed to the surface, fertilizing phytoplankton blooms that soak up CO2, they write today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

      Such a “fertilization effect” would be “really surprising,” says Thornton, who has studied methane emissions above seeps in the Laptev and East Siberian seas. “There are lots of nutrients in bottom water and bringing that to the surface could certainly [result in] draw down of CO2.”…”

      Like

      Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 17, 2019

        https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180117164022.htm

        Release of ancient methane due to changing climate kept in check by ocean waters

        Date:
        January 17, 2018
        Source:
        University of Rochester
        Summary:
        Ocean sediments are a massive storehouse for the potent greenhouse gas methane. But methane only acts as a greenhouse gas if and when it reaches the atmosphere. Environmental scientists recently set out to discover whether or not this ancient-sourced methane, which is released due to warming ocean waters, survives the journey from the seafloor and reaches the atmosphere.

        “…Sparrow; her advisor, John Kessler, an associate professor of earth and environmental sciences; and a team of scientists from the Universities of Rochester, California Irvine, Minnesota Duluth, and Colorado Boulder, as well as the US Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, conducted fieldwork just offshore of the North Slope of Alaska, near Prudhoe Bay. Sparrow calls the spot “ground zero” for oceanic methane emissions resulting from ocean warming. In some parts of the Arctic Ocean, the shallow regions near continents may be one of the settings where methane hydrates are breaking down now due to warming processes over the past 15,000 years….

        …”We do observe ancient methane being emitted from the seafloor to the overlying seawater, confirming past suspicions,” Kessler says. “But, we found that this ancient methane signal largely disappears and is replaced by a different methane source the closer you get to the surface waters.” The methane at the surface is instead from recently produced organic matter or from the atmosphere.

        Although the researchers did not examine in this study what prevents methane released from the seafloor from reaching the atmosphere, they suspect it is biodegraded by microorganisms in the ocean before it hits the surface waters. Mihai Leonte, a PhD candidate in Kessler’s research group, observed this process — in which microbes aggressively biodegrade methane as methane emissions increase — in a paper published last year.

        “We found that very little ancient methane reaches surface waters even in the relatively shallow depths of 100 feet. Exponentially less methane would be able to reach the atmosphere in waters that are thousands of feet deep at the very edge of the shallow seas near continents, which is the area of the ocean where the bulk of methane hydrates are,” Sparrow says. “Our data suggest that even if increasing amounts of methane are released from degrading hydrates as climate change proceeds, catastrophic emission to the atmosphere is not an inherent outcome.”…

        …This study was primarily funded by the National Science Foundation with additional contributions from the Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the University of Minnesota.”

        Like

        Reply
  13. eleggua

     /  January 12, 2019

    Not able to comment on youtube (and oftern unable to watch, either) however in taking a look at those sections on Robert’s vids, doesn’t seem to be as vibrant as things were here before he directed most of his energies in that direction. The contributions here were – and still are – valuable however the converstion and contributions are far less than pre-youtube daze.

    Oh, well.

    Like

    Reply
  14. wharf rat

     /  January 12, 2019

    Tesla Semi receives another order, electric trucks will move goods in Europe

    Tesla Semi, the automaker’s electric truck division, has received another order ahead of the start of production, which is planned for later this year.

    The electric trucks will be used to move goods from Europe to Norway.

    Travel Retail Norway, which operates the duty-free stores at Norway’s five largest airports, announced that it has ordered two Tesla Semi electric trucks in a press release today.

    https://electrek.co/2019/01/11/tesla-semi-order-electric-trucks-europe/

    Like

    Reply
  15. mlp in nc

     /  January 12, 2019

    I appreciate the comments from everyone. They are a major reason I follow this blog. I am also unable to comment on the Youtube site.

    After reading the articles, I had a thought on the hot spots. (Please don’t laugh). The area west of Svalbard is a known major methane leak. To my understanding, the methane does not reach the atmosphere because it is either dissolved into the water or metabolized. Sources seem to vary as to how much is metabolized, although one did say the majority was. If so, that is a lot of biologic activity. No particular reason I know of that methane itself should be hot, but could large enough colonies of methane metabolizing bacteria produce enough heat to affect the ocean temperature? I am not at all sure this is a reasonable thought, but at least it would not vary much by season. On the plus side these are huge permanent leaks that must have a permanent and happy colony of metabolizers, probably even happier as the Gulf Stream warms.
    Also to note that the mid-oceanic ridge, and the site of presumed volcanoes, converge near the leaks at the west of Svalbard. That would not explain the more eastern site, but I do note that the eastern one is considerably cooler than the western one.

    Like

    Reply
    • Leland Palmer

       /  January 13, 2019

      Hi mlp-
      I had similar thoughts, so if they are laughable, well count me in as being laughable too. Generally the sun is the biggest source of environmental heat, I think. Could methane release be fueling algae blooms, that absorb more sunlight?

      Are there visible algae blooms in the area, persisting since 2015? Don’t know, probably not.

      One prediction: if relict metastable methane hydrate is involved, the anomalies should be in areas that were under thick glaciers in very recent geological time. This could include the area with volcanic seamounts close to the surface near Svalbard, I think. I think someone called that area Loki’s Castle, or something similar. Of course, these volcanoes were recently discovered so maybe nobody knows if they were glaciated.

      So, if we can find a map of very recent glaciated areas in the region, that might tell us something.

      Like

      Reply
  16. Robert in New Orleans

     /  January 15, 2019

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is already pressuring Nancy Pelosi on climate change

    https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/11/14/18094452/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-nancy-pelosi-protest-climate-change-2020

    VIVA AOC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like

    Reply
  17. mlp in nc

     /  January 15, 2019

    I am afraid that the very fact that this article is big news (or the technique feasible) is not too good.

    Understanding physics could lead to big gains in shale oil recovery. Source: Penn State https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190115111917.htm
    Summary:
    Oil companies are missing out on vast sums of recoverable oil in unconventional reservoirs, according to experts.

    Like

    Reply
  18. Robert in New Orleans

     /  January 16, 2019

    Antarctica ice melt has accelerated by 280% in the last 4 decades

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/14/world/climate-change-antarctica-ice-melt-twin-studies/index.html

    Like

    Reply
    • Robert in New Orleans

       /  January 16, 2019

      Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979–2017
      https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/01/08/1812883116

      Abstract:
      We use updated drainage inventory, ice thickness, and ice velocity data to calculate the grounding line ice discharge of 176 basins draining the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1979 to 2017. We compare the results with a surface mass balance model to deduce the ice sheet mass balance. The total mass loss increased from 40 ± 9 Gt/y in 1979–1990 to 50 ± 14 Gt/y in 1989–2000, 166 ± 18 Gt/y in 1999–2009, and 252 ± 26 Gt/y in 2009–2017. In 2009–2017, the mass loss was dominated by the Amundsen/Bellingshausen Sea sectors, in West Antarctica (159 ± 8 Gt/y), Wilkes Land, in East Antarctica (51 ± 13 Gt/y), and West and Northeast Peninsula (42 ± 5 Gt/y). The contribution to sea-level rise from Antarctica averaged 3.6 ± 0.5 mm per decade with a cumulative 14.0 ± 2.0 mm since 1979, including 6.9 ± 0.6 mm from West Antarctica, 4.4 ± 0.9 mm from East Antarctica, and 2.5 ± 0.4 mm from the Peninsula (i.e., East Antarctica is a major participant in the mass loss). During the entire period, the mass loss concentrated in areas closest to warm, salty, subsurface, circumpolar deep water (CDW), that is, consistent with enhanced polar westerlies pushing CDW toward Antarctica to melt its floating ice shelves, destabilize the glaciers, and raise sea level.

      Like

      Reply
    • Robert in New Orleans

       /  January 16, 2019

      Antarctic ice-sheet sensitivity to obliquity forcing enhanced through ocean connections
      https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-018-0284-4.epdf?referrer_access_token=nJm960GOX3nPE7f7v_4rd9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0Ot_gu31-eQPxiztIuzStKFE6UdtLeqWzC_6QrFMHEaeusaiEeLdXimlBP2GlxRtD1krvi44yqlaR2ZYqTV1hXDJDwhxAT8Ej7N_3jVGTDl3t86oo1KOy3jPLFxC74308cSs2qbDRBt–tqILB–DLlvUovv8oUB2J-m_ZjYo5c9XhGjQ-VdkjEPMhZc6LMgBwNI5CbG3CkDpts59WvGvbrP94cIOKk6oQ33H7w5gfmPA%3D%3D&tracking_referrer=www.cnn.com

      Abstract:
      Deep sea geological records indicate that Antarctic ice-sheet growth and decay is strongly influenced by the Earth’s astronomical variations (known as Milankovitch cycles), and that the frequency of the glacial–interglacial cycles changes through time. Here we examine the emergence of a strong obliquity (axial tilt) control on Antarctic ice-sheet evolution during the Miocene by corre-lating the Antarctic margin geological records from 34 to 5 million years ago with a measure of obliquity sensitivity that compares the variance in deep sea sediment core oxygen-isotope data at obliquity timescales with variance of the calculated obliquity forc-ing. Our analysis reveals distinct phases of ice-sheet evolution and suggests the sensitivity to obliquity forcing increases when ice-sheet margins extend into marine environments. We propose that this occurs because obliquity-driven changes in the meridi-onal temperature gradient affect the position and strength of the circum-Antarctic easterly flow and enhance (or reduce) ocean heat transport across the Antarctic continental margin. The influence of obliquity-driven changes in ocean dynamics is amplified when marine ice sheets are extensive, and sea ice is limited. Our reconstruction of the Antarctic ice-sheet history suggests that if sea-ice cover decreases in the coming decades, ocean-driven melting at the ice-sheet margin will be amplified.

      Like

      Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 16, 2019

        Pinball.

        ‘Earth’s Tilt May Exacerbate a Melting Antarctic’
        By Stephanie Pappas, Live Science Contributor | January 16, 2019
        https://www.livescience.com/64507-antarctica-ice-melt-earth-tilt.html

        ” As levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide rise and warm the globe, Antarctica’s ice will become more vulnerable to cycles on an astronomical scale, particularly the tilt of our planet is as it spins around its axis.

        New research finds that over 30 million years of history, Antarctica’s ice sheets responded most strongly to the angle of Earth’s tilt on its axis when the ice extends into the oceans, interacting with currents that can bring warm water lapping at their margins and leading to increased melting. The effect of the tilt peaked when carbon dioxide levels were similar to what scientists predict for the next century, if humans don’t get emissions under control. [Collapsing Beauty: Image of Antarctica’s Larsen Ice Shelf]

        As carbon dioxide levels push past 400 parts per million, the climate will become more sensitive to the Earth’s tilt, or obliquity, researchers reported Jan. 14 in the journal Nature Geoscience.

        “Really critical is the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,” said study co-author Stephen Meyers, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

        A scenario of high carbon dioxide and high tilt angle could be particularly devastating to the the miles-thick ice covering Antarctica……..”

        Like

        Reply
      • mlp in nc

         /  January 17, 2019

        To add one more, from Bob Henson:
        Antarctic Sea Ice Dips to Record-Low Extent for Early January
        https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/Antarctic-Sea-Ice-Dips-Record-Low-Extent-Early-January?cm_ven=cat6-widget

        Like

        Reply
  19. Robert in New Orleans

     /  January 16, 2019

    This is another nail in the coffin for coastal living or actually a couple dozen pneumatically driven nails into every coastal coffin. Take my advice, if you are a coastal resident, sell your property a to denialist while you can and move out as quickly as possible. There will be NO happy ending to this secnario.

    DR. ORRIN PILKEY: WALK AWAY FROM THE COAST

    [audio src="https://www.ecoshock.net/downloads/ES_Pilkey_LoFi.mp3" /]

    Like

    Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 16, 2019

        Dr. Orrin Pilkey makes good points therein, except this one:
        ““I’m no longer interested in awakening the masses. The masses made it clear that they are not interested.””

        If you’ve been reading here for a few years, recall Robert Scribbler’s words re: giving up:
        “Pinch yourself, still alive”. Keep moving forward, raising awareness and creating connections between folks that are also moving forward and not giving up. The more the merrier.

        We’re all “the masses”. The tipping point we’re approaching involves raised awareness among a significant amount of the human biomass – not even a majority, just the critical amount to move past the tipping point and into the realm of radical solutions for radical problems.

        Like

        Reply
        • eleggua

           /  January 16, 2019

          The “masses” in action:
          https://gofossilfree.org/

          “Fossil Free is a global campaign led by local groups demanding our local communities and institutions commit to:

          A fast + just transition to 100% renewable energy for all
          No new fossil fuel projects anywhere.
          Not a penny more for dirty energy

          We are a powerful movement of citizens around the world working to build a future that’s free from the destructive impacts of climate change, and free from the massive, out-of-control corporations that caused it.

          How does it work?

          Fossil Free is about leveraging our power where it’s most effective — in our local communities. Small groups of people coming together are transforming their communities and the world. We join that power together in a connected global movement, that shares tools, tactics and an exciting vision for our world.

          We campaign to take away everything the fossil fuel industry needs to grow and survive: their social licence, their political licence, and their money. We organise in our communities to stop or ban new coal, oil and gas infrastructure.

          We organise and focus the huge public support for renewable energy into actionable commitments by our local institutions for 100% renewable energy. Those commitments are not only transforming our energy system, but also support and retrain workers affected by the changes, and put the ownership of energy back with the people.

          Everyone is welcome.

          Climate change isn’t just an environmental issue, or a social justice issue, or an economic issue — it’s all of those at once. It’s one of the biggest challenges humanity has ever faced, and we’re going to have to work together to solve it.

          This movement actively welcomes the talents, energy & commitment of all individuals volunteering their time, regardless of their background, ethnicity, religious or spiritual belief, gender and sexual orientation. We react immediately against hate and discrimination.

          Principle #2:
          We’re all leaders.

          Each group has the power to decide its own organising, facilitation, decision-making, communications, tactics and actions. We’re all responsible collectively for making sure we live up to our values and shared organising principles.

          Principle #3:
          We take action.

          Taking action is how we build public support behind our cause. And we recognise the importance of escalating those actions when our demands aren’t met.

          We are committed to maintaining non-violent discipline in all of our actions. We support those who take direct action and respect those who are not in a position to take part. We encourage a wide range of tactics — it strengthens our movement.”

          Like

        • Robert in New Orleans

           /  January 17, 2019

          RE:
          Dr. Orrin Pilkey makes good points therein, except this one:
          ““I’m no longer interested in awakening the masses. The masses made it clear that they are not interested.””

          You may want to reread the article that I highlighted from the Radio Ecoshock website, as Dr Pilkey did not make that statement in is interview with the host Alex Smith.
          Mr Smith was describing climate blogger burnout:

          As we head into 2019, I notice several long-time climate bloggers and Facebook activists are “retiring” to their private lives. For example Robert Leisure, an American living in Salzburg Austria ran this on his final Facebook post for 2018:

          “I’m no longer interested in awakening the masses. The masses made it clear that they are not interested.”

          Robert’s Facebook page now describes him as “Former messenger of climate change now focusing on maximizing each day loving life and my loved ones“. That brought out a chorus of agreement from other climate activists, like Robin Westenra in New Zealand, and Dorsi Lynn Diaz in California. As Pink Floyd sang in “The Wall”: “It’s not easy banging your heart against some mad bugger’s wall“.

          I must continue with Radio Ecoshock. As Sylvia Boorstein just wrote:

          “When I recognize the pain I feel as the legitimate result of loss, I am respectful of its presence and kind to myself. My mind always relaxes when it is kind, and around the edges of the truth of whatever has ended, I see displays of what might be beginning.”

          ellegua, I can understand your misreading of the article as it was not as well edited as it should have been.

          Cordially Yours,
          RiNO

          Go Saints!

          Like

        • eleggua

           /  January 19, 2019

          Thanks for the correction, Robert. That pull quote in the box, minus attribution, stood out amidst the text. My misread, though; no excuse.

          Interesting; Pilkey promotes moving away from the coast asap et the lab built six years ago is smack-dab on the coast.

          https://nicholas.duke.edu/marinelab/about/facilities/orrin-pilkey-laboratory

          “The Orrin Pilkey research laboratory is the first new research space to be added to the Marine Laboratory campus of Duke University since the construction of the Bookhout Research Laboratory in the 1960s. In addition to research and office space for three faculty members, the Pilkey Lab includes a two-story ‘collisional commons’ where the Pivers Island community can meet and exchange ideas in an informal setting, a conference room, a classroom designed for courses that use molecular techniques, plus office space for graduate students, research staff and visiting faculty….

          …The Pilkey Laboratory is located on Pivers Island, an inner island of the North Carolina coast, protected from the ocean by inner and outer barrier islands. Hurricane-force winds occasionally batter the coast and, as sea level rises over the next century, storm surge could inundate the lowest portions of the island. As Duke University considered new construction, attention to hurricanes and sea-level rise were important design specifications.

          The Pilkey Laboratory has been engineered to withstand both 132 mph hurricane-force winds and flooding with minimal damage….”

          Like

      • eleggua

         /  January 19, 2019

        The Orrin Pilkey research laboratory is the first new research space to be added to the Marine Laboratory campus of Duke University since the 1970s. In addition to research and office space for three faculty members, the Pilkey Lab includes a two-story ‘collisional commons’, a conference room, a classroom designed for courses that use molecular techniques, plus office space for graduate students, research staff and visiting faculty.

        As Duke University considered new construction, attention to hurricanes and sea-level rise were important design specifications. The Pilkey Laboratory has been designed to target the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) ‘Gold’ standards in the ‘Leadership in Energy and Environment Design’ (LEED) rating system.

        Like

        Reply
  20. Robert in New Orleans

     /  January 16, 2019

    To Those Who Think We Can Reform Our Way Out of the Climate Crisis
    https://www.thenation.com/article/climate-change-fossil-fuel-capitalism-divorce/

    Like

    Reply
    • mlp in nc

       /  January 17, 2019

      Will not open. Can you excerpt a bit?

      Like

      Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 19, 2019

        Peaceful global revolution: an evolutionary inevitability.

        “Welcome to the future. It feels like it, doesn’t it? Like we have reached the end of something—of the days when the Arctic was not actually in flames, when the permafrost was not a sodden mush, when the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets were not rushing to join the quickly rising seas. Perhaps we have also, finally, reached the end of the days when we could soothe ourselves with lies, or delusions at least; when we imagined that we were the only masters here, that we could keep taking what we wanted, and that no one would ever have to pay.

        We are paying now. Twenty eighteen was the year that temperatures scraped 90 degrees in the Norwegian Arctic; that permafrost in northern Siberia failed to freeze at all; that wildfires burned on the taiga there, as well as above the Arctic Circle in Alaska and Sweden, in the moors of northern England, in Greece, and in California, where they showed no sense of poetic restraint whatsoever and reduced a place called Paradise to ash.

        And where there wasn’t fire, there were floods: Hundreds died and millions were evacuated from rising waters in Japan, southern China, and the Indian state of Kerala. Venice flooded too, and Paris, where the Louvre had to close its Department of Islamic Arts, which it had consigned, ahem, to a basement. It was also the year the United Nations’ climate change body warned that, to avoid full-on cataclysm, we, the humans of planet Earth, would have just 12 years (11 now) to cut carbon emissions by 45 percent, and 32 years (31 and counting) to eliminate such emissions altogether.

        Still, the weather may be the least of our problems. The fire that razed Paradise displaced 52,000 people overnight, forcing many into the ranks of California’s swelling homeless population and what passes for a safety net these days: free berths on the asphalt in a Walmart parking lot. Millions more of us will become refugees when a mega-storm drowns Miami or Manila, and when the Bay of Bengal rises high enough to swallow Bangladesh. Narendra Modi’s India is ready, and has nearly finished stretching barbed wire across the entire 2,500-mile border with Bangladesh. By conservative estimates, climate change will displace a quarter of a billion people over the next 31 years. Most will not be wealthy, and most will not be white.

        We do know, at least, how we got here. It was all that oil and coal that we burned, that we’re still burning. But that “we” is misleading. It isn’t all of us, and never was. As the Swedish scholar Andreas Malm recounts in Fossil Capital, his exhaustive account of the rise of the coal-powered steam engine, coal was initially embraced by a tiny subclass of wealthy Englishmen, the ones who owned the mills. They came to favor steam over hydropower in large part because it allowed them to erect factories in cities and towns—rather than submitting to the dictates of distant rivers and streams—giving them access to what we would now call a flexible workforce: masses of hungry urbanites accustomed to the indignities of factory labor, willing to toil for less, easily replaceable if they refused.

        In the process these early industrialists created the illusion fundamental to the functioning of our entire economic system: the possibility of self-sustaining growth. Machines could always move faster, squeezing more work out of fewer hands for greater and greater profits. After the Second World War, the same logic would push the transition from coal to oil: It took far less labor to get oil out of the ground and to transport it across continents, plus coal miners had an alarming tendency to strike.

        From its inception, then, the carbon economy has been tied to the basic capitalist mandate to disempower workers, to squeeze the most sweat out of people for the least amount of money. For the last 200-odd years, the exploitation of the planet has been inseparable from the exploitation of living human beings.

        This is why, though the alarm bells about anthropogenic warming began tolling more than half a century ago, the carbon habit has proven nearly impossible to break. Since 1990, when international climate negotiations commenced, carbon emissions have jumped by more than 60 percent. Last year, as the fires burned and the floodwaters rose, they leaped by a projected 2.7 percent. It’s almost as if someone’s profiting from our misfortune. And they are: Six of the 10 highest-earning corporations on last year’s Fortune Global 500 list made their money extracting or delivering fossil energy; two were automobile manufacturers and one—Walmart, the planet’s richest brand—relied on a system of globalized trade inconceivable without massive consumption of fossil fuels. Even on an individual level, the richest 1 percent have a carbon footprint 2,000 times larger than the poorest inhabitants of Honduras or Mozambique, countries that have contributed next to nothing to global warming and are suffering disproportionately from it. We already know well that the 1 percent do not let go of power willingly.

        Nor will our political system likely be much help, even with our survival as a species at stake. Politicians are not often good at thinking in planetary terms. The system in which they function—national governments and international institutions alike—evolved alongside the carbon economy and has for decades functioned mainly to serve it. However enlightened their representatives may appear at climate talks, wealthy countries continue to subsidize fossil-fuel extraction—last year to the tune of $147 billion. In the United States, Trumpian climate denialism and Pelosian tepidity are two faces of the same phenomenon. Congressman Frank Pallone, who chairs the toothless committee that Pelosi resurrected to tackle climate change, announced that he plans to propose nothing more than “some oversight” of Trump’s assaults on preexisting federal programs, and that requiring committee members to reject donations from fossil-fuel industries would be “too limiting.”

        Centrists continue to reassure, unshaken in the conviction that no problem exists that cannot be solved with a little technocratic fiddling. Just before he left office, Barack Obama penned an article in Science, contending that climate change “mitigation need not conflict with economic growth.” Wealthy countries, the argument goes, have already managed to reduce emissions without sacrificing growth. “Decoupling” is the magic word here. Imagine a gentle, Gwyneth Paltrowesque divorce between fossil fuels and capital, followed by a fresh romance with greener tech, perhaps a few extra therapy bills for the kids.

        But someone always gets hurt in a break-up. The techno-optimist dream holds together only if you hide the fact that much of the progress made by the United States and Europe came at the expense of poorer countries: As corporations off-shored manufacturing jobs over the last few decades, they sent the carbon-intensive industries with them, allowing Western consumers, at the clean end of a very dirty process, to import massive quantities of goods. The only year so far this millennium that global emissions have dropped was 2009. It took a global financial meltdown and more than a year of recession for fossil-fuel consumption to even dip.

        or now, the petroligarchy is winning. Thirteen years ago, Hurricane Katrina gave us an early taste of the future they have built for us: a murderous, militarized, racialized response to human vulnerability. Now we are living in it. We know what their world looks like: abundance for the few behind walls and razor wire, precarity and impoverishment for the rest of us; endless prisons for endless streams of migrants, concentration camps by other names.

        But there are other futures, other worlds as yet unmade. We have only to choose ours, and to fight like hell for it—fiercely, with forms of solidarity that we have not yet been able to imagine. Solidarity not only with one another but with this planet and the many forms of life it hosts. There is no way out of this but to cease to view the Earth, and its populations, as an endless sink of resources from which wealth can be extracted.

        This is not hippie idealism but purest practicality: There is no way to preserve anything approximating the status quo without turning into monsters, or cadavers, and no way to survive that is not radical. In this future we will need to keep our eyes open and learn to calm ourselves only with truths. If other worlds are not yet visible, it is because they are ours to make. ”

        By Ben Ehrenreich
        January 15, 2019

        Like

        Reply
  21. Robert in New Orleans

     /  January 16, 2019

    Climate Documentary: The Cross of the Moment

    Like

    Reply
  22. eleggua

     /  January 17, 2019

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180806152021.htm

    Wetter soil is leading to reduced methane gas absorption
    The trend could accelerate an increase in atmospheric methane levels and intensify global warming

    Date:
    August 6, 2018
    Source:
    Advanced Science Research Center, GC/CUNY
    Summary:
    A new paper finds that the existing effects of global warming are decreasing the soil’s ability to absorb methane gas. The paper details findings from a study that measured forest-soil uptake of methane gas in a variety of locations and settings over a 13- to 27-year span and detected decreases of 53 to 89 percent.

    Like

    Reply
  23. mlp in nc

     /  January 17, 2019

    eleggua and Leland Palmer,
    Thanks again for the methane articles. Maybe eventually I will make sense of something. I checked publication titles from SWERUS-C3. No mention of Svalbard hot spots.
    To follow up on the Barrow methane eruption, the measurements have been revised and are much less impressive than they were. Tiksi is still out.

    Like

    Reply
    • mlp in nc

       /  January 17, 2019

      +12.1C Gulf Stream SSTA south of Greenland. (43.48N, 57.05W) on Earth Nullschool. Ramping up.

      Like

      Reply
  24. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    Watching Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory Rise Before Our Eyes Through 2019
    Brian Wang | January 17, 2019

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/01/watching-teslas-shanghai-gigafactory-rise-before-our-eyes-through-2019.html

    “…China Construction Third Engineering Bureau is helping to build Gigafactory 2. It is a subsidiary of China Construction, which is owned by the government.

    Pictures and videos tracking the construction will be coming out of China every week. We will see the factory rise before our eyes.

    How long until the foundation is laid? I would guess 45 days or less.

    How long until the building structure is completed? I would say 90 days or less.

    Elon Musk has said the factory should be complete within 6 months.

    How long until the first cars are produced? Elon Musk has said Model 3 cars should be produced by the end of 2019 at the China Gigafactory….”

    Like

    Reply
    • eleggua

       /  January 19, 2019

      “Tesla Shanghai Lingang Gigafactory 3 – Jan 17th 2019 特斯拉上海超級工廠 From the video, it shows that construction already started and good numbers of heavy equipment are operating on the site. Looking forward to the success of Tesla’s development in China.

      If you are getting a Tesla, receive 6 months free Supercharging services by using my referral code: vincent68747 “

      Like

      Reply
  25. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    Upper-ocean warming is changing the global wave climate, making waves stronger
    January 14, 2019, University of California – Santa Cruz
    https://phys.org/news/2019-01-upper-ocean-global-climate-stronger.html

    “…In a study published January 14 in Nature Communications, researchers report that the energy of ocean waves has been growing globally, and they found a direct association between ocean warming and the increase in wave energy….

    …The new study focused on the energy contained in ocean waves, which is transmitted from the wind and transformed into wave motion. This metric, called wave power, has been increasing in direct association with historical warming of the ocean surface. The upper ocean warming, measured as a rising trend in sea-surface temperatures, has influenced wind patterns globally, and this, in turn, is making ocean waves stronger.

    “For the first time, we have identified a global signal of the effect of global warming in wave climate. In fact, wave power has increased globally by 0.4 percent per year since 1948, and this increase is correlated with the increasing sea-surface temperatures, both globally and by ocean regions,” said lead author Borja G. Reguero, a researcher in the Institute of Marine Sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Climate change is modifying the oceans in different ways, including changes in ocean-atmosphere circulation and water warming, according to coauthor Inigo J. Losada, director of research at the Environmental Hydraulics Institute at the University of Cantabria (IHCantabria), where the study was developed.

    “This study shows that the global wave power can be a potentially valuable indicator of global warming, similarly to carbon dioxide concentration, the global sea level rise, or the global surface atmospheric temperature,” Losada said.

    Understanding how the energy of ocean waves responds to oceanic warming has important implications for coastal communities, including anticipating impacts on infrastructure, coastal cities, and small island states….”

    Like

    Reply
  26. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    ‘Warming seas likely to be reason bluefin tuna are returning to Westcountry waters’
    2 JAN 2019
    https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/warming-seas-likely-reason-bluefin-2383781

    “Warming seas may be the reason bluefin tuna, one of the ocean’s fastest predators, have come back to Westcountry waters, scientists say.

    The finding could be bad news for fishermen hoping to cash in on the return of the fish, which can reach weights of more than 900kg and speeds of 40mph….

    …In recent years they have been seen – and sometimes caught – in South West seas for the first time in 40 years….

    ”Dr Kirby is part of a multinational team which has studied tuna records over the past 200 years. They have found that a climate cycle that affects the sea surface temperature in the North Atlantic may be responsible for bringing back the tuna.

    The “seesaw” of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation is now in a warm phase, and it may be that rather than changing population size which has led to more sightings.

    “Should we catch and exploit this endangered species or should we make UK waters a safe space for this incredible fish?” Dr Kirby said.

    Research by Dr Kirby, along with Dr Robin Faillettaz from the University of Lille, France, and Drs Gregory Beaugrand and Eric Goberville, suggests the answer should be no to more fishing.

    Dr Faillettaz said: “The ecological effects of the oscillation have long been overlooked. Our results represent a breakthrough in understanding the history of tuna in the North Atlantic.

    ”The oscillation, which switches every 60 to 120 years, affects ocean currents, drought on land and even the frequency and intensity of hurricanes. During its previous warm phase in the middle of the 20th century the North Sea had a bluefin tuna fishery that rivalled the Mediterranean. In the early 1960s the oscillation switched in the space of just two years from its highest to its lowest recorded values, and the tuna disappeared from more northerly waters until the late 1990s, when the latest phase began.”

    Like

    Reply
    • eleggua

       /  January 19, 2019

      So I was out fishing for scallops on Tuesday 15th August 2017 just off Falmouth in Cornwall (uk waters) when we seen this feeding frenzy… fought we would steam towards it see what we could see but never ever expected to steam right through the middle of it, unbelievable sight and a rare one in our waters!!! Futures promising!!!!

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      • Jean Swan

         /  January 21, 2019

        I stopped eating tuna a long time ago when I read that ancient, large female tunas know the long migration routes..amazing..great video

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply
        • eleggua

           /  January 22, 2019

          In this 18+ minute doc, over the course of two weeks scientists in Japan eat tuna and measure the rising levels of mercury in their blood until…

          The Cove: Mercury Rising: A mini-documentary on the hazards of mercury in fish From the Producers of the Oscar nominated film, “The Cove”. It explores the dangers of mercury contamination and how it affects society and the global environment. In the U. S., eating tuna, swordfish and other high-mercury fish is the number one source of mercury exposure.

          Like

      • That’s fabulous but I don’t know who’s more excited, the tuna or the fishermen…

        Like

        Reply
        • eleggua

           /  January 22, 2019

          Excited tuna excites Cornish observers.

          Sep 20, 2018
          A Bluefin Tuna caught on camera in the shallows at Porthkidney beach.

          Liked by 2 people

  27. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    Similar positive feedback loop as what’s occuring on Greenland with ‘Dark Snow’.

    ‘Dust blowing off the shrinking Great Salt Lake is eroding Wasatch snowpack and that could eventually threaten drinking water’
    December 22, 2018

    https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2018/12/22/dust-blowing-off/

    “The winds kicked up in Utah’s West Desert ahead of a late-season storm blowing out of the south and into the Wasatch Mountains, which were then coated with a heavier-than-usual snowpack. But soon the winds shifted west and scraped up particles from the bed of the Great Salt Lake, left exposed from chronically receding lake levels.

    The wind event on April 13, 2017, was just what McKenzie Skiles, a young professor of geography who harbors a deep fascination with snow, was waiting for.

    She left her office in Salt Lake City to visit a study plot she and her University of Utah research team set up at the town of Alta high up in the Wasatch’s Little Cottonwood Canyon. Freshly deposited dust was darkening the snow.

    From her team’s measurements, Skiles has concluded that these particles, particularly from the Great Salt Lake’s ever-expanding dry bed, are significantly increasing the pace of the Wasatch Mountains’ spring runoff.

    “We used the amount of dust in the snowpack to calculate how much additional sunlight the dust would absorb relative to a dust-free snowpack,” Skiles said. “We found that from this one event, dust accelerated snowmelt by five days. And dust from all events [in the spring of 2017] accelerated snowmelt by 25 percent.”

    This observation could have serious consequences for the Utah cities that rely on the Central Wasatch for drinking water, according to the team’s paper published Friday in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

    Through a property known as albedo, clear snow reflects much of the sun’s radiant energy, but snow covered in dust absorbs that energy and melts faster than it otherwise would, according to Salt Lake City hydrologist Brian McInerney, who was not involved with the study.

    “Any time you melt snow earlier than you typically see, it’s much less efficient. You lose much more to evaporation and to the atmosphere,” said McInerney, who works for the National Weather Service.

    That leaves less water available for human uses or to eventually return to the Great Salt Lake, further lowering its level and exposing more lakebed that could lead to more dust storms — a troubling feedback loop….”

    Like

    Reply
  28. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    ‘As Study Ties ‘Great Dying’ of 252 Million Years Ago to Current Climate Crisis, Experts Say Still Time for ‘Different Path’
    December 06, 2018

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/12/06/study-ties-great-dying-252-million-years-ago-current-climate-crisis-experts-say

    “For the first time ever, researchers have tied “climate change triggered by volcanic greenhouse gases” to the largest extinction in Earth’s history, often called the “Great Dying,” 252 million years ago—and their findings, published Thursday by Science, are just the latest fuel added to the burning concern about the world’s current extinction crisis.

    The study adds to a growing body of research on alarming declines in biodiversity, offering a glimpse of what could come of the planet’s inhabitants if global warming is allowed to continue unabated. The Great Dying, at the end of the Permian Period, wiped out 96 percent of all marine species and 70 percent of terrestrial species.

    “The ultimate, driving change that led to the mass extinction is the same driving change that humans are doing today, which is injecting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere,” Justin Penn, a University of Washington doctoral student in oceanography and the study’s lead author, told the Seattle Times.

    “The study tells us what’s at the end of the road if we let climate [change] keep going,” warned Curtis Deutsch, Penn’s co-author and PhD adviser, as the latest projections show emissions hitting record-breaking levels this year. “The further we go, the more species we’re likely to lose… That’s frightening. The loss of species is irreversible.”…

    …”As our understanding of the drivers and consequences of end-Permian climate change and mass extinction improves,” Kump added, “the lessons for the future become clear.”

    “It’s entirely within our control to steer the planet on a different path away from the brink,” concluded meteorologist and Grist columnist Eric Holthaus. “Reading about this may make you may feel powerless, but collectively, our choices are the most powerful geological force in our planet’s history.”

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  29. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    Algae, impurities darken the Greenland ice sheet and increase melting
    April 4, 2018
    https://phys.org/news/2018-04-algae-impurities-darken-greenland-ice.html

    “The Dark Zone of Greenland ice sheet is a large continuous region on the western flank of the ice sheet; it is some 400 kilometers wide stretching about 100 kilometres up from the margin of the ice.

    Some previous theories have attributed this darkening to water on top of the ice sheet – often seen as strikingly sapphire blue ponds, rivers and lakes. But a new study in Nature Communications provides a new hypothesis based on the character of the impurities on the ice surface itself.

    “What we show is that the Dark Zone is covered in a finely distributed layer of dust, and black carbon, which provide nutrition for dark coloured algae. These are the main cause of the darkening.” says professor Alun Hubbard, the co-author of the study and professor at CAGE—Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate at UiT The Arctic University of Norway….

    …The fact that a large portion of the western flank of the Greenland ice sheet has become dark means that the melt is up to five times as much as if it was a brilliant snow surface. ” says Hubbard.

    Algae – a major player

    The ice algae seem to be one of the major players in this scheme – even the slight increase of the atmospheric temperature and liquid water production seems to promote algae colonization across the ice surface.

    “The algae need nutrients and food, essentially dust, organic carbon, and water. In summer, these are plentiful and the algal bloom takes off. Because algae are dark in colour – they reinforce the dark zone. Thereby you get a positive feedback effect where the ice sheet absorbs even more solar radiation producing yet more melt.”…

    Like

    Reply
  30. eleggua

     /  January 19, 2019

    Dark Zone of Greenland

    Like

    Reply
    • mlp in nc

       /  January 22, 2019

      And interesting to see all the frozen melt ponds, still in beautifully clear blues.

      Like

      Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 22, 2019

        Images at the link below, plus links to other images and an interesting podcast on the topic.

        NASA Visible Earth: Melt Ponds, Northeastern Greenland

        https://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=35696

        The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite captured this image of the Greenland Ice Sheet August 30, 2008. Taken over northeastern Greenland, the top image shows (left to right) the eastern margin of the ice sheet, bare rocks of the coastline, and fragments of sea ice floating on the ocean surface. The black rectangle indicates the detailed view that is shown in the bottom image. In both the wide-area and zoomed views, the ice sheet margin appears pale blue-gray, which may be a sign it is saturated with water. Deeper blue pools of standing melt water dot the ice sheet’s surface.

        Melt ponds have played a role in the breakup of the Larsen Ice Shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula, where dense pools of water sliced through sections of the shelf like a wedge. In Greenland, melt ponds ultimately find their way into crevasses or moulins—chutes that carry melt water through the ice sheet. Many glaciologists suspect that the melt water finds its way to the bottom of the ice sheet where it lubricates the base of the ice, reducing friction between the ice and the underlying rock, and speeding glacier flow. As the glacier accelerates, it pushes ice into the ocean. This introduction of additional ice into the ocean can raise sea level, just as dropping extra ice cubes into a glass raises the level of a drink.

        Like

        Reply
  31. Ancient climate change triggered warming that lasted thousands of years

    A rapid rise in temperature on ancient Earth triggered a climate response that may have prolonged the warming for many thousands of years, according to scientists.

    Their study, published online in Nature Geoscience, provides new evidence of a climate feedback that could explain the long duration of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), which is considered the best analogue for modern climate change.

    The findings also suggest that climate change today could have long-lasting impacts on global temperature even if humans are able to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

    “We found evidence for a feedback that occurs with rapid warming that can release even more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,” said Shelby Lyons, a doctoral student in geosciences at Penn State. “This feedback may have extended the PETM climate event for tens or hundreds of thousands of years. We hypothesize this is also something that could occur in the future.”

    Like

    Reply
    • eleggua

       /  January 22, 2019

      “We hypothesize this is also something that could occur in the future.”

      “We” is the key. We’ve dramatically (drastically) altered the earth’s climate in a relatively short span of time. We can re-solve the problems in a similar, relatively short span of time.
      Pay attention to the problems while focusing on clean solutions.

      https://www.drawdown.org/

      “Project Drawdown is the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. We did not make or devise the plan—the plan exists and is being implemented worldwide. It has been difficult to envision this possibility because the focus is overwhelmingly on the impacts of climate change. We gathered a qualified and diverse group of researchers from around the world to identify, research, and model the 100 most substantive, existing solutions to address climate change. What was uncovered is a path forward that can roll back global greenhouse gas emissions within thirty years. The research revealed that humanity has the means and techniques at hand. Nothing new needs to be invented, yet many more solutions are coming due to purposeful human ingenuity. The solutions we modeled are in place and in action. Humanity’s task is to accelerate the knowledge and growth of what is possible as soon as possible.”

      “Our Mission

      Project Drawdown gathers and facilitates a broad coalition of researchers, scientists, graduate students, PhDs, post-docs, policy makers, business leaders and activists to assemble and present the best available information on climate solutions in order to describe their beneficial financial, social and environmental impact over the next thirty years.

      Our Vision

      To date, the full range and beneficial impact of climate solutions have not been explained in a way that bridges the divide between urgency and agency. The aspirations of people who want to enact meaningful solutions remain largely untapped. Dr. Leon Clark, one of the lead authors of the IPCC 5th Assessment, wrote, “We have the technologies, but we really have no sense of what it would take to deploy them at scale.” Together, let’s figure this out.”

      ‘Drawdown’ – the book:

      “Drawdown maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global warming. For each solution, we describe its history, the carbon impact it provides, the relative cost and savings, the path to adoption, and how it works. The goal of the research that informs Drawdown is to determine if we can reverse the buildup of atmospheric carbon within thirty years. All solutions modeled are already in place, well understood, analyzed based on peer-reviewed science, and are expanding around the world.

      The subtitle of Drawdown—The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming—may sound brash. We chose that description because no detailed plan to reverse warming has been proposed. There have been agreements and proposals on how to slow, cap, and arrest emissions, and there are international commitments to prevent global temperature increases from exceeding two degrees centigrade over pre-industrial levels. One hundred and ninety-five nations have made extraordinary progress in coming together to acknowledge that we have a momentous civilizational crisis on our earthly doorstep and have created national plans of action. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has accomplished the most significant scientific study in the history of humankind, and continues to refine the science, expand the research, and extend our grasp of one of the most complex systems imaginable—climate. However, there is as yet no roadmap that goes beyond slowing or stopping emissions.

      To be clear, our organization did not create or devise a plan. We do not have that capability or self-appointed mandate. In conducting our research, we found a plan, a blueprint that already exists in the world in the form of humanity’s collective wisdom, made manifest in applied, hands-on practices and technologies. Individuals, communities, farmers, cities, companies, and governments have shown that they care about this planet, its people, and its places. Engaged citizens world over are doing something extraordinary. This is their story.”

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      • marcyincny

         /  January 23, 2019

        Unfortunately I think the “we” everyone refers to is a relatively infinitesimal number. For me the most incomprehensible aspect of this moment in human history continues to be how a few humans can understand more of the natural world than ever before while billions of humans live as though they’re above and beyond any natural limits.

        Like

        Reply
  32. Think Progress, By Joe Romm, January 17

    The most dangerous climate feedback loop is speeding up

    In Siberia, the carbon-rich permafrost warmed by 1.6°F in just the last decade

    The carbon-rich permafrost warmed “in all permafrost zones on Earth” from 2007 to 2016, according to a new study.

    Most ominously, Siberian permafrost at depths of up to 30 feet warmed a remarkable 1.6°F (0.9°C) in those 10 years, the researchers found. The permafrost, or tundra, is soil that stays below freezing (32°F) for at least two years.

    Like

    Reply
  33. New York Times: Greenland’s Melting Ice Nears a ‘Tipping Point,’ Scientists Say, Jan 21.

    Greenland’s enormous ice sheet is melting at such an accelerated rate that it may have reached a “tipping point,” and could become a major factor in sea-level rise around the world within two decades, scientists said in a study published on Monday.

    The Arctic is warming at twice the average rate of the rest of the planet, and the new research adds to the evidence that the ice loss in Greenland, which lies mainly above the Arctic Circle, is speeding up as the warming increases. The authors found that ice loss in 2012, more than 400 billion tons per year, was nearly four times the rate in 2003. After a lull in 2013-14, losses have resumed.

    Quite a few links in this article; the paper itself is paywalled.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  34. Mother Jones / ProPublica: For 20 Years, US Carbon Emissions Have Been Dropping. Last Year, They Spiked.

    Not spiked: increased by 3.4%, actually. Wouldn’t call that a spike. No…

    Like

    Reply
    • eleggua

       /  January 22, 2019

      “The Rhodium Group created its estimate by using government data for the first three quarters of 2018 combined with more recent industry data. The United States government will publish its official emissions estimates for all of 2018 later this year.” – NYT, 1.8.2019

      The source of that report is a “private research company”, the Rhodium Group.
      What’s their motivation? Who are they?

      From the Rhodium Group website:
      ” RHG’s advanced economies team analyzes the shocks and challenges confronting higher-income mature economies.

      Assessing the declining commercial and political dominance of the incumbent economic leaders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and insights derived equally from quantitative analysis, political assessment and frequent interactions with policymakers.”

      ” Rhodium analyzes the market impact of energy and environmental policy and the economic risks of global climate change.

      Rhodium’s Energy & Climate research team includes policy experts, economists, energy modelers, climate scientists and data engineers. The team uses a suite of proprietary and open-source models to analyze the economic, energy market and emissions impact of policy developments at the local and national level, and international levels. Through the Climate Impact Lab, they provide decision-makers in the public, financial services, corporate, philanthropic and non-profit sectors with actionable information about the economic risks of climate change in different sectors of the economy and regions of the world.”

      From Young China Watchers website:
      “Daniel H. Rosen is the founding partner of RHG (aka Rhodium Group) and leads the firm’s work on China. Mr. Rosen is affiliated with a number of American thinktanks focused on international economics. He is also an adjunct associate professor at Columbia University, where he has taught graduate seminars on the Chinese economy at the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) since 2001. Mr. Rosen writes and speaks extensively on China and other emerging economy topics. He is a frequent contributor to major print and television media and high-level speaking events (including Aspen Institute, Caixin Magazine, Bloomberg and private client functions) on topics including China, Chinese investment flows and economic performance, and US-China economic relations. His seventh major report, on Chinese foreign direct investment in the United States, was published in 2011.

      From 2000-2001, Mr. Rosen was Senior Adviser for International Economic Policy at the White House National Economic Council and National Security Council, where he played a key role in completing China’s accession to the World Trade Organization and accompanied the President to Asia for summits and state visits. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and board member of the National Committee for US-China Relations.”

      Like

      Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 22, 2019

        “(Rhodium Group’s) advanced economies team analyzes the shocks and challenges confronting higher-income mature economies.”

        Future Shock is coming down fast. The power brokers are getting nervous; they sense, their daze of ruling are threatened but don’t realize yet, those daze are numbered.
        Their daze of enjoying “business as usual” are almost over. Peaceful global revolution is an evolutionary inevitability; they’re on the wrong side of evolution and are struggling to forestall the inevitable. Klarman’s clarion call to his investors created a stir of concern at Davos.

        “As business and political leaders arrive in the Swiss Alps for the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, a surprisingly alarming letter from an influential investor who studiously eschews attention has already emerged as a talking point.

        The letter, written by Seth A. Klarman, a billionaire investor known for his sober and meticulous analysis of the investing world, is a huge red flag about global social tensions, rising debt levels and receding American leadership….

        His dire letter, which is considerably bleaker than his previous writings, is a warning shot that a growing sense of political and social divide around the globe may end in an economic calamity.

        “It can’t be business as usual amid constant protests, riots, shutdowns and escalating social tensions,” he wrote….

        …“Social frictions remain a challenge for democracies around the world, and we wonder when investors might take more notice of this.” He added, “Social cohesion is essential for those who have capital to invest.”…

        …“It is not hard to imagine worsening social unrest among a generation,” he wrote, “that is falling behind economically and feels betrayed by a massive national debt that was incurred without any obvious benefit to them.””

        Like

        Reply
      • eleggua

         /  January 22, 2019

        The Tofflers’ prescient 1970 work, Future Shock, is worth taking a look at now.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Shock

        “Future Shock is a 1970 book by the futurists Alvin and Heidi Toffler,[1] in which the authors define the term “future shock” as a certain psychological state of individuals and entire societies. Their shortest definition for the term is a personal perception of “too much change in too short a period of time”…

        …The Tofflers argued that society is undergoing an enormous structural change, a revolution from an industrial society to a “super-industrial society”. This change overwhelms people. He believed the accelerated rate of technological and social change left people disconnected and suffering from “shattering stress and disorientation”—future shocked. The Tofflers stated that the majority of social problems are symptoms of future shock. In their discussion of the components of such shock, they popularized the term “information overload.” …

        …Alvin and Heidi Toffler’s main thought consists of the fact that modern man feels shock from rapid changes. For example, Toffler’s daughter went to shop in New York City and she couldn’t find a shop in its previous location. Thus New York has become a city without a history. The urban population doubles every 11 years. The overall production of goods and services doubles each 50 years in developed countries. Society experiences an increasing number of changes with an increasing rapidity, while people are losing the familiarity that old institutions (religion, family, national identity, profession) once provided. The so-called “brain drain” – the emigration of European scientists to the United States – is both an indicator of the changes in society and also one of their causes….”

        Like

        Reply
        • eleggua

           /  January 22, 2019

          “‘Future Shock’ is a documentary film based on the book written in 1970 by sociologist and futurist Alvin Toffler. Released in 1972, with a cigar-chomping Orson Welles as on-screen narrator, this piece of futurism is darkly dystopian and oozing techno-paranoia.”

          Like

        • eleggua

           /  January 22, 2019

          “Electrical information devices for universal, tyrannical womb-to-tomb surveillance are causing a very serious dilemma between our claim to privacy and the community’s need to know.
          The older, traditional ideas of private, isolated thoughts and actions – the patterns of mechanistic technologies – are very seriously threatened by new methods of instantaneous electric information retrieval, by the electrically computerized dossier bank –
          that one big gossip column that is unforgiving, unforgetful and from which there is no redemption, no erasure of early “mistakes.”

          We have already reached a point where remedial control, born out of knowledge of media and their total effects on all of us, must be exerted.

          How shall the new environment be programmed now that we have become so involved with each other, now that all of us have become the unwitting work force for social change?

          What’s that buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzjng?”

          – Marshall McLuhan, ‘The Medium Is the Massage’, 1967

          Like

  35. DJ LX

     /  January 23, 2019

    Is AOC drinking cool aid out of Guy McPherson pitcher? https://www.yahoo.com/news/apos-world-end-12-years-143637684.html Although, to be fair she qualifies the prediction with “if we don’t take action.” But yeah, she’s right, climate change IS the most pressing crisis facing us today and it’s not hyperbole to frame it as an existential issue.

    Like

    Reply
  36. Connecticut Gordon

     /  January 23, 2019

    Hi
    Has nobody noticed the alarming CO2 levels this past week or so. For January they are about 5 points higher this year than last, and the three highs for last year at just over 412 have already been shattered three times this past 10 days. A figure of 413.86 in January suggests at the very least 416 by May and probably much higher, perhaps 418 on current trends. That would be a staggering increase year over year. I have not seen any comment on this in the national press nor on any website.

    https://www.co2.earth/daily-co2?noaa-mauna-loa-co2-data.html

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: